Key result
Walking football matches are linked to ~610% higher injury rates than training.
Why the study?
While rule modifications in Walking Football aim to reduce injury risk, this has yet to be established.
What is the injury incidence in community-based Walking Football for middle-aged and older adults?
Cohort
Yes
What is the injury incidence in community-based Walking Football for middle-aged and older adults?
Effect estimate: Rate ratio 7.1 (95% CI 1.3-31.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 37.6% vs 5.3%
Injury incidence in community-based Walking Football is low, supporting its safety as a physical activity strategy for middle-aged and older adults.
Walking Football is a growing adapted sport offering a viable alternative to traditional exercise for middle-aged and older adults. While rule modifications aim to reduce injury risk, this has yet to be established. This study conducted injury surveillance in community-based Walking Football to determine injury incidence and characteristics in training and matches. A four-month observational cohort study remotely tracked injuries and exposure time across seven Walking Football clubs in England using a sub-elite injury surveillance framework. Injuries were classified as medical attention (requiring on-field attention without subsequent absence) or time-loss (≥1 day of participation absence). Injury incidence was calculated per 1000 h of play. Across 6364.55 h of exposure, 45 injuries were reported: 30 (66.7%) medical attention and 15 (33.3%) time-loss injuries. Injury incidence was 5.3 [1.5-11.5] per 1000 h in training (medical attention: 3.3 [0.8-7.3]; time-loss: 2.0 [0.5-4.5]) and 37.6 [8.7-83.9] per 1000 h in matches (medical attention: 28.9 [5.8-66.6]; time-loss: 8.7 [0-23.2]). Match injury incidence was significantly higher than training (rate ratio: 7.1 [1.3-31.4]). Findings suggest that injury incidence in community-based Walking Football is low, supporting its safety and potential as a sustainable physical activity strategy for middle-aged and older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Price et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Walking Football participation. Walking Football matches vs. Walking Football training was evaluated on Injury incidence per 1000 hours of play (Rate ratio 7.1, 95% CI 1.3-31.4). Walking Football matches had a significantly higher injury incidence compared to training (37.6 vs 5.3 per 1000 hours; rate ratio 7.1, 95% CI 1.3-31.4), though overall injury rates remained low.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: