Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 21, 2016Renal FailureOpen Access

Transapical versus transfemoral approach and risk of acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a propensity-adjusted analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Transapical TAVR significantly increased the risk of acute kidney injury compared with a transfemoral approach (38% vs. 18%, p < 0.01; matched OR 3.82, 95% CI 2.04-7.44).

Why the study?

Does a transapical approach increase the risk of acute kidney injury compared to a transfemoral approach in patients undergoing TAVR for aortic stenosis?

Population

366 consecutive adult patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis at a…

Comparison

Transapical (TA) approach for TAVR (n=171) vs Transfemoral (TF) approach for TAVR (n=195)

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

6 months

Authors

CTCharat ThongprayoonUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreWCWisit CheungpasitpornUniversity of California, Riverside
Narat Srivali
Narat SrivaliVascular / Pulmonary Vascular

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Transapical TAVR was associated with higher AKI risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending randomized data.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=366)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a transapical approach increase the risk of acute kidney injury compared to a transfemoral approach in patients undergoing TAVR for aortic stenosis?

P
Population
366 consecutive adult patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis at a tertiary referral hospital
I
Intervention
Transapical (TA) approach for TAVR (n=171)
C
Comparator
Transfemoral (TF) approach for TAVR (n=195)
O
Outcome
Incidence of post-procedural acute kidney injury (AKI) based on KDIGO criteriasafety

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 3.82 (95% CI 2.04-7.44)

Absolute Event Rate: 38% vs 18%

p-value: p=< .01

The transapical approach for TAVR is associated with a significantly higher risk of acute kidney injury compared to the transfemoral approach, although it does not appear to affect long-term renal function at 6 months.

Cite This Study

Thongprayoon et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in aortic stenosis (n=366). Transapical (TA) approach vs. Transfemoral (TF) approach was evaluated on post-procedural acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 3.82, 95% CI 2.04-7.44, p=< .01). Transapical TAVR significantly increased the risk of acute kidney injury compared with a transfemoral approach (38% vs. 18%, p < 0.01; matched OR 3.82, 95% CI 2.04-7.44).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10ab121da2186dec39587dhttps://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x.2016.1244072

Topics

Transcatheter aortic valve replacementTAVR in low-risk patients
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve replacement2015 · 33 citations
  2. 2Acute Kidney Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2015 · 55 citations
  3. 3Acute Kidney Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation2022 · 52 citations
  4. 4Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; a kidney’s perspective2016 · 49 citations
  5. 5Long-Term Results of Transapical Versus Transfemoral TAVI in a Real World Population of 1000 Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis2015 · 85 citations