Why the study?
Does bipolar orthogonal floating atrial electrode sensing improve P to QRS wave discrimination compared to unipolar electrodes?
Does bipolar orthogonal floating atrial electrode sensing improve P to QRS wave discrimination compared to unipolar electrodes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bipolar orthogonal floating atrial electrodes provide superior P to QRS wave discrimination compared to unipolar electrodes, supporting the feasibility of single-pass lead physiologic pacing.
We investigated wave morphology and spectral energy distributions of signals picked up by floating atrial unipolar and bipolar orthogonal sensing electrodes. Our data show that atrial P and QRS waves from unipolar floating electrodes are comparable. On the other hand, atrial P and QRS waves from bipolar orthogonal floating electrodes are significantly different. Even at high and mid right atrial locations, QRS waves are either absent or much smaller in amplitude and lower in frequency content than P waves. We conclude that the bipolar orthogonal floating atrial electrode is superior to the unipolar one for sensing due to its P to QRS wave discriminating power, which makes complex input filters or algorithms unnecessary. Our data support the idea that physiologic pacing with a VDD or VAT pacemaker is possible using a single pass lead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aubert et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: