In 2025, the first known case of what appears to be an article generated by artificial intelligence that plagiarized a CJCCJ article was reported to the journal and its publisher. Such fraudulent bootlegging practices challenge the legitimacy of scientific research and the peer-review process, while raising a number of critical issues with the rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs). This article presents an overview of this new phenomenon of AI-assisted plagiarism, a set of concerning issues that the scientific community is currently struggling with. While LLMs are unlikely to go away any time soon, currently available tools to detect AI-assisted plagiarism of legitimate research are not adequate and mechanisms to prevent it are non-existent. In that content, we speculate that this case could be a first of many more to come that will impact not only criminology but also other academic disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lussier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: