Why the study?
Does an automated dynamic programming procedure accurately measure carotid artery lumen diameter and intima-media thickness compared to manual measurement?
Does an automated dynamic programming procedure accurately measure carotid artery lumen diameter and intima-media thickness compared to manual measurement?
An automated dynamic programming procedure can accurately measure carotid artery lumen diameter and intima-media thickness with low variability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reproducible automated LD/IMT measurements feasible; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Describes a computerized technique for automated ultrasonic measurements of the carotid artery based on dynamic programming. Local measurements vessel echo intensity, edge strength, and continuity were extracted by image analysis techniques and included as weighted terms in a cost function. The dynamic programming procedure was used for determining the locations of the vessel interfaces in a way that the cost function was minimized. Then lumen diameter (LD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) were computed. Inter-method (auto versus manual) variability as well as inter- and intraobserver variability was studied by computing conventional coefficient of variation (CV). Inter-method (n=22), inter-observer (n=50), and intra-observer (n=47) variability of LD measurements were 1.2, 0.90, and 1.0%, respectively. Corresponding values for IMT were 3.2, 4.7, and 3.6%. These results indicate that the carotid artery can be automatically measured with accuracy.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustavsson et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: