Key result
An automated procedure for measuring carotid blood flow velocity achieved sample volume placement similar to expert operators, with an accuracy of 3.2% and repeatability of 4.5%.
Why the study?
Carotid blood flow velocity assessment is clinically important, but access is limited by equipment costs and a lack of expert sonographers.
Does an automated procedure for carotid blood flow measurement provide accuracy and repeatability comparable to expert operators?
Does an automated procedure for carotid blood flow measurement provide accuracy and repeatability comparable to expert operators?
An automated procedure for carotid blood flow measurement demonstrates high accuracy and repeatability, potentially enabling self-measurement with low-cost handheld ultrasound devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated carotid flow placement matches experts in pilot data; leaves open validation for clinical self-measurement.
The assessment of the velocity of blood flowing in the carotid, in modern clinical practice, represents an important exam performed both in emergency situations and as part of scheduled screenings. It is typically performed by an expert sonographer who operates a complex and costly clinical echograph. Unfortunately, in developing countries, in rural areas, and even in crowded modern cities, the access to this exam can be limited by the lack of suitable personnel and ultrasound equipment. The recent availability of low-cost, handheld devices has contributed to solving part of the problem, but a wide access to the exam is still hampered by the lack of expert sonographers. In this work, an automated procedure is presented with the hope that, in the near future, it can be integrated into a low-cost, handheld instrument that is also suitable for self-measurement, for example, as can be done today with the finger oximeter. The operator should only place the probe on the neck, transversally with respect to the common tract of the carotid. The system, in real-time, automatically locates the vessel lumen, places the sample volume, and performs an angle-corrected velocity measurement of the common carotid artery peak velocity. In this study, the method was implemented for testing on the ULA-OP 256 scanner. Experiments on flow phantoms and volunteers show a performance in sample volume placement similar to that achieved by expert operators, and an accuracy and repeatability of 3.2% and 4.5%, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matera et al. (2021) studied this question. Automated procedure for carotid blood flow velocity measurement vs. Expert operators was evaluated on Sample volume placement performance, accuracy, and repeatability. An automated procedure for measuring carotid blood flow velocity achieved sample volume placement similar to expert operators, with an accuracy of 3.2% and repeatability of 4.5%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: