Key result
A novel ultrasound image processing method for deriving carotid artery pressure waveforms showed a strong correlation and a mean absolute difference of -1.333±6.548 mm Hg compared to standard radial sphygmomanometry.
Why the study?
Does an ultrasound image processing method accurately estimate the blood pressure waveform of the carotid artery compared to standard radial sphygmomanometry in healthy men?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does an ultrasound image processing method accurately estimate the blood pressure waveform of the carotid artery compared to standard radial sphygmomanometry in healthy men?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ultrasound image processing of the carotid artery provides a feasible noninvasive method to estimate central blood pressure waveforms that correlates well with peripheral sphygmomanometry.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to introduce and implement a noninvasive method to derive the carotid artery pressure waveform directly by processing diagnostic sonograms of the carotid artery. METHODS: Ultrasound image sequences of 20 healthy male subjects (age, 36±9 years) were recorded during three cardiac cycles. The internal diameter and blood velocity waveforms were extracted from consecutive sonograms over the cardiac cycles by using custom analysis programs written in MATLAB. Finally, the application of a mathematical equation resulted in time changes of the arterial pressure. The resulting pressures were calibrated using the mean and the diastolic pressure of the radial artery. RESULTS: A good correlation was found between the mean carotid blood pressure obtained from the ultrasound image processing and the mean radial blood pressure obtained using a standard digital sphygmomanometer (R=0.91). The mean absolute difference between the carotid calibrated pulse pressures and those measured clinically was -1.333±6.548 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that consecutive sonograms of the carotid artery can be used for estimating a blood pressure waveform. We believe that our results promote a noninvasive technique for clinical applications that overcomes the reproducibility problems of common carotid artery tonometry with technical and anatomical causes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soleimani et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=20). Ultrasound image processing method vs. Standard digital sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Mean absolute difference between carotid calibrated pulse pressures and clinically measured radial pulse pressures (MD -1.333 mm Hg). A novel ultrasound image processing method for deriving carotid artery pressure waveforms showed a strong correlation and a mean absolute difference of -1.333±6.548 mm Hg compared to standard radial sphygmomanometry.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: