Key result
Transfer-function-free technique estimates systolic pressure ~4 mmHg higher than tonometry, but aligns over age 35.
Why the study?
Central aortic blood pressure carries key physiological and prognostic data, but transfer function-based devices reconstruct pressure waveforms that seem to preserve peripheral waveform features.
Does a transfer-function-free technique using local wave speed accurately estimate local arterial pressure compared to tonometry in human subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=203)
Does a transfer-function-free technique using local wave speed accurately estimate local arterial pressure compared to tonometry in human subjects?
Effect estimate: Mean difference +3.8 mmHg (systolic) and +2.3 mmHg (mean)
p-value: p=0.015
A novel transfer-function-free technique using local wave speed from ultrasound can noninvasively estimate local arterial pressure, with accuracy improving in individuals over 35 years old.
Biases versus tonometry preclude routine adoption; leaves open prospective validation of wave-speed methods before clinical use.
The estimation of central aortic blood pressure is a cardinal measurement, carrying effective physiological, and prognostic data beyond routine peripheral blood pressure. Transfer function-based devices effectively estimate aortic systolic and diastolic blood pressure from peripheral pressure waveforms, but the reconstructed pressure waveform seems to preserve features of the peripheral waveform. We sought to develop a new method for converting the local diameter distension waveform into a pressure waveform, through an exponential function whose parameters depend on the local wave speed. The proposed method was then tested at the common carotid artery. Diameter and blood velocity waveforms were acquired via ultrasound at the right common carotid artery while simultaneously recording pressure at the left common carotid artery via tonometer in 203 people (122 men, 50 ± 18 years). The wave speed was noninvasively estimated via the lnDU-loop method and then used to define the exponential function to convert the diameter into pressure. Noninvasive systolic and mean pressures estimated by the new technique were 3.8 ± 21.8 (p = 0.015) and 2.3 ± 9.6 mmHg (p = 0.011) higher than those obtained using tonometery. However, differences were much reduced and not significant in people >35 years (0.6 ± 18.7 and 0.8 ± 8.3 mmHg, respectively). This proof of concept study demonstrated that local wave speed, estimated from noninvasive local measurement of diameter and flow velocity, can be used to determine an exponential function that describes the relationship between local pressure and diameter. This pressure-diameter function can then be used for the noninvasive estimation of local arterial pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giudici et al. (2021) reported a cross-sectional. Transfer-function-free technique vs. Tonometry was evaluated on Difference in estimated systolic and mean pressures (Mean difference +3.8 mmHg (systolic) and +2.3 mmHg (mean), p=0.015). A transfer-function-free technique estimated systolic and mean pressures 3.8±21.8 mmHg (p=0.015) and 2.3±9.6 mmHg (p=0.011) higher than tonometry, with non-significant differences in people >35 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: