Key result
A novel noninvasive ultrasound-based method estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure with an accuracy/precision of -2.36/10.21 mmHg and -0.32/8.23 mmHg compared to cuff readings.
Why the study?
Does a novel ultrasound-based finite element model approach accurately estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to oscillometric cuff readings in healthy volunteers?
Population
24 healthy volunteers
Comparison
Noninvasive blood pressure estimation using… vs Oscillometric blood pressure cuff readings
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Accurate in small healthy cohort; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before clinical consideration.
Observational (n=24)
Does a novel ultrasound-based finite element model approach accurately estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to oscillometric cuff readings in healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: systolic accuracy/precision: -2.36/10.21 mmHg; diastolic accuracy/precision: -0.32/8.23 mmHg
A novel noninvasive ultrasound-based method using finite element models can estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure, offering a potential alternative to cuff-based techniques.
Zakrzewski et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=24). Ultrasound-based blood pressure estimation algorithm vs. Oscillometric blood pressure cuff readings was evaluated on Systolic and diastolic blood pressure estimation accuracy and precision (systolic accuracy/precision: -2.36/10.21 mmHg; diastolic accuracy/precision: -0.32/8.23 mmHg). A novel noninvasive ultrasound-based method estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure with an accuracy/precision of -2.36/10.21 mmHg and -0.32/8.23 mmHg compared to cuff readings.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: