Key result
Force-measured ultrasound estimates blood pressure with ~5 mmHg systolic accuracy versus cuff measurements.
Why the study?
Does a non-invasive force-measured ultrasound device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to an oscillometric cuff in adult volunteers?
Does a non-invasive force-measured ultrasound device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to an oscillometric cuff in adult volunteers?
Effect estimate: Systolic accuracy -5.2 mmHg, precision 10.7 mmHg
Force-measured ultrasound provides a novel, calibration-free, non-invasive method for estimating real-time blood pressure with potential applications for continuous self-monitoring.
May support calibration-free ambulatory BP monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation trials before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to create a blood pressure measurement device, which may provide a way to easily acquire frequent measurements. Common techniques to measure blood pressure include an arterial catheter, an oscillometric pressure cuff, or an auscultatory pressure cuff. METHODS: The approach takes as input ultrasound images of an artery and contact force between the ultrasound array and subject. A subject may perform the self-measurements. Image and force data is analyzed for its quality and used to provide guidance or reject poor measurements. Tissue motions, due to probe contact forces and pulsing blood pressure, are estimated from the ultrasound image. Tissues elasticities and blood pressure are found by optimally fitting the observed tissue motion versus applied forces to a table of predicted motion-pre-generated with a finite element tissue deformation model. The output of the optimization is an estimate of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and surrounding tissue stiffness. RESULTS: The real-time implementation of the algorithm was validated on a cohort of 21 single-visit volunteers and on four volunteers self-monitored longitudinally. The systolic and diastolic pressures were compared to oscillometric cuff readings. Regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed. CONCLUSION: Systolic pressure and diastolic pressure can be estimated in real-time and by the subject using this novel non-invasive ultrasound-based method (systolic accuracy/precision: -5.2 mmHg/10.7 mmHg; diastolic accuracy/precision: -3.9/8.0 mmHg). SIGNIFICANCE: The method occupies a middle ground between the arterial catheter and cuff-based techniques. It has the potential to give calibration-free results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zakrzewski et al. (2018) studied Healthy volunteers (n=25). Force-measured ultrasound blood pressure estimation vs. Oscillometric blood pressure cuff was evaluated on Systolic and diastolic blood pressure accuracy and precision (Systolic accuracy -5.2 mmHg, precision 10.7 mmHg). Force-measured ultrasound estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure with an accuracy/precision of -5.2/10.7 mmHg and -3.9/8.0 mmHg, respectively, compared to cuff measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: