Key result
A five-week education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved cardiovascular risk (p=0.002), health behaviors (p<0.001), and quality of life (p=0.001).
Why the study?
Does a five-week education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve cardiovascular risk, health behavior, and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=44)
No
Does a five-week education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve cardiovascular risk, health behavior, and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=0.002
A 5-week education and counseling-based cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improves cardiovascular risk profiles, health behaviors, and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary artery disease.
May support brief rehab in elderly CAD; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
본 연구는 교육상담 기반 심장재활 프로그램이 노인 관상동맥질환자의 심혈관 위험도와 건강행위 및 삶의 질에 미치는 효과를 확인하고자 실시하였다. 유사 실험설계의 비동등성 대조군 전후시차설계를 이용하였다. 2010년 5월 1일부터 9월 30일까지 부산광역시 D병원에 입원한 노인 관상동맥질환자를 대상으로 자료수집하였다. 실험군 22명, 대조군 22명 총 44명을 편의표집하고, 교육상담 기반 심장재활 프로그램의 효과를 확인하기 위하여 심혈관 위험도, 건강행위 및 삶의 질을 측정하였다. 교육상담 기반 심장재활 프로그램을 받은 실험군은 받지 않은 대조군보다 심혈관 위험도(U=118.5, p=.002), 건강행위(t=6.776, p=.001)와 삶의 질(t=2.431, p=.010)에서 통계적으로 유의하게 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구에서 개발한 교육상담 기반 심장재활 프로그램은 노인 관상동맥질환자의 심혈관 위험도를 감소시키고 건강행위와 삶의 질을 높이는데 효과적인 간호 중재임이 확인되었다. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program on cardiovascular risk, health behavior and quality of life in elderly with coronary artery disease. Methods: A quasi-experimental study used a non-equivalent control group pre-post test design. A five week education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program for the elderly with coronary artery disease was developed and offered to the experimental group. Participants were drawn from hospital in Busan. Twenty two were selected for the experimental group while 22 were assigned to a control group. Cardiovascular risk, health behavior and quality of life were measured. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the cardiovascular risk(U=118.5, p=.002), health behaviors(t=5.200, p=<.001) and quality of life(t=2.431, p=.001) between the experimental group and the control group. Conclusion: Education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program can be not only an effective nursing intervention for old patients having coronary artery disease, but also the very basis of further research on aged people who have the same symptom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mi Hwa Won (2015) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=44). Education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program vs. Control group was evaluated on Cardiovascular risk, health behavior and quality of life (p=0.002). A five-week education and counselling-based cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved cardiovascular risk (p=0.002), health behaviors (p<0.001), and quality of life (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: