Why the study?
Does pulsed Doppler tissue imaging accurately and reproducibly measure myocardial wall velocities compared to M-mode echocardiography in normal subjects?
Does pulsed Doppler tissue imaging accurately and reproducibly measure myocardial wall velocities compared to M-mode echocardiography in normal subjects?
Pulsed Doppler tissue imaging is an accurate and highly reproducible method for assessing myocardial wall velocities, outperforming M-mode echocardiography in reproducibility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports Doppler for velocity research in normals; leaves open validation and clinical utility in disease.
To validate the use of pulsed Doppler tissue imaging that measures myocardial wall velocities and to define the characteristics of these velocities in normal subjects, we obtained and compared the anteroseptal and posterior wall velocities in 24 volunteers with pulsed Doppler tissue imaging and digitized M-mode echocardiography. We also studied the relation between velocity components and hemodynamic events timed by standard Doppler flows. There was an excellent correlation between Doppler and M-mode-derived velocities (r = 0.95, p < 0.001), with higher reproducibility for Doppler (r = 0.99) than for M-mode (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). Biphasic velocities that were uniformly present during isovolumic contraction and relaxation were attributed to geometric changes due to asynchronous contraction and ventricular interdependence. We conclude that wall velocities obtained by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging are accurate and reproducible. This method may prove useful for studying the contractile and elastic properties of the myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: