Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Determining the right sample size for empirical studies is a persistent challenge in human–computer interaction research. Studies with too few participants risk low statistical power and unreliable findings, yet existing tools for power analysis, such as G*Power, are often difficult to use. We present PowerMeter, a user-centered tool that helps researchers estimate appropriate sample sizes for quantitative studies. PowerMeter focuses on usability and interpretability, guiding users through the process of defining key study parameters and understanding the implications of statistical power. In a pilot study (N = 60), we find that participants using PowerMeter produced more accurate sample size estimates and reported higher levels of trust and satisfaction than those using G*Power.
Martius et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: