Key result
Adding a behavioral program to cardiac rehab drives ~5% greater weight loss than rehab alone.
Why the study?
Most cardiac rehabilitation programs do not incorporate structured, evidence-based obesity treatment, potentially limiting efficacy for coronary heart disease patients with overweight or obesity.
Does adding a behavioral weight loss program to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve weight loss in overweight/obese adults with coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=38)
Does adding a behavioral weight loss program to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve weight loss in overweight/obese adults with coronary heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.4% vs 1.2%
p-value: p=.001
Adding a behavioral weight loss intervention to standard cardiac rehabilitation is feasible and leads to significantly greater weight and fat loss in overweight/obese adults with CHD.
Supports incorporating behavioral weight loss into cardiac rehabilitation for overweight CHD patients; extends evidence for combined lifestyle interventions in secondary prevention.
PURPOSE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are integral in the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, most programs do not incorporate structured, evidence-based obesity treatment, potentially limiting efficacy for the large number of CHD patients with overweight/obesity. This pilot study determined the feasibility of adding a behavioral weight loss intervention during standard CR. METHODS: Adults aged ≥40 yr with CHD and overweight/obesity were randomized to 6 mo of CR alone or CR plus a behavioral weight loss program incorporating meal replacements and individual dietary counseling (CR + WL). Body weight, adiposity, cardiometabolic risk factors, self-efficacy for eating, and stages and processes of change for weight management (S-Weight, P-Weight) were assessed at baseline and during follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-eight participants (64.5 ± 7.9 yr, 24% female, 16% Black/Hispanic) were enrolled over 18 mo. Retention was high, with 95% of participants completing the 6-mo follow-up visit. Participants attended ∼58% of the prescribed exercise sessions, and those in the CR + WL group attended 98% of the prescribed weight loss sessions. The CR + WL group lost significantly more weight than the CR group (6.4 ± 4.7% vs 1.2 ± 3.0%, P = .001), and there were significant treatment effects for total/regional adiposity, eating self-efficacy, and P-weight scores (all P values < .05). Overall, greater weight loss was associated with improvements in self-efficacy ( P = .014) and P-weight scores for weight consequences evaluation ( P = .007) and weight management actions ( P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: A behavioral weight loss intervention during CR is feasible and safe, leading to greater weight and fat loss and related improvements in weight maintenance behaviors in overweight/obese adults with CHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinkley et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease and overweight/obesity (n=38). Cardiac rehabilitation plus behavioral weight loss program vs. Cardiac rehabilitation alone was evaluated on Weight loss (%) (p=.001). Adding a behavioral weight loss program to standard cardiac rehabilitation resulted in significantly greater weight loss compared to cardiac rehabilitation alone (6.4% vs 1.2%, P = .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: