Although there is some evidence that online videos are increasingly used by academics for informal scholarly communication and teaching, the extent to which they are used in published academic research is unknown. This article explores the extent to which Y ou T ube videos are cited in academic publications and whether there are significant broad disciplinary differences in this practice. To investigate, we extracted the URL citations to Y ou T ube videos from academic publications indexed by S copus. A total of 1,808 S copus publications cited at least one Y ou T ube video, and there was a steady upward growth in citing online videos within scholarly publications from 2006 to 2011, with Y ou T ube citations being most common within arts and humanities (0.3%) and the social sciences (0.2%). A content analysis of 551 Y ou T ube videos cited by research articles indicated that in science (78%) and in medicine and health sciences (77%), over three fourths of the cited videos had either direct scientific (e.g., laboratory experiments) or scientific‐related contents (e.g., academic lectures or education) whereas in the arts and humanities, about 80% of the Y ou T ube videos had art, culture, or history themes, and in the social sciences, about 63% of the videos were related to news, politics, advertisements, and documentaries. This shows both the disciplinary differences and the wide variety of innovative research communication uses found for videos within the different subject areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kousha et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: