Key result
Household material hardship linked to ~22% lower quality of life in children with advanced heart disease.
Why the study?
Socioeconomic status is associated with outcome disparities in paediatric CHD, but the prevalence and longitudinal course of household material hardship into the chronic phase remained unclear.
Cohort (n=160)
Absolute Event Rate: 64% vs 82%
p-value: p=0.013
Household material hardship is highly prevalent during acute hospitalization for pediatric heart disease and is associated with significantly lower quality of life, highlighting a key target for improving health equity.
May warrant screening for material hardship in pediatric advanced heart disease families; leaves open whether interventions improve quality of life.
BACKGROUND: CHD is a lifelong condition with a significant burden of disease to patients and families. With increased survival, attention has shifted to longer-term outcomes, with a focus on social determinants of health. Among children with CHD, socioeconomic status is associated with disparities in outcomes. Household material hardship is a concrete measure of poverty and may serve as an intervenable measure of socioeconomic status. METHODS: A longitudinal survey study was conducted at multiple time points (at acute hospitalisation, then 12-24 months later in the chronic phase) to determine the prevalence of household material hardship among parents of children with advanced heart disease and quality of life during long-term follow-up. RESULTS: The analytic cohort was 160 children with a median patient age of 1 year (IQR 1,4) with 54% of patients <2 years. During acute hospitalisation, over one-third of families reported household material hardship (37%), with significantly lower household material hardship in the chronic phase at 16% (N = 9 of 52). For parents reporting household material hardship during acute hospitalisation, 50% had resolution of household material hardship by the chronic phase. Household material hardship-exposed children were significantly more likely to be publicly insured (56% versus 20%, p = 0.03) with lower quality of life than those without household material hardship (64% versus 82%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The burden of heart disease during the chronic phase of illness is high. Household material hardship may serve as a target to ensure equity in the care and outcomes of CHD patients and their families.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hummel et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart disease / Congenital Heart Disease (n=160). Household material hardship vs. No household material hardship was evaluated on Quality of life during long-term follow-up (p=0.013). Children with advanced heart disease exposed to household material hardship had significantly lower quality of life during the chronic phase compared to those without hardship (64% vs 82%, p=0.013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: