Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACTResearch question While there is a growing body of scholarship on institutional work in sport, less is known about the role of emotions by which institutions are affected. This study aims to explore the role of emotions in sport-for-development and peace (SDP)-related institutional work to challenge conditions of social inequality for refugees in Kampala, Uganda. Two core research questions are: (1) How do emotions related to forced displacement inform the institutional work of an SDP organization? (2) What emotions are mobilized by refugees and an SDP organization to challenge the institution of social inequality?Research methods Guided by a participatory action research approach, fieldwork was undertaken with a refugee-led organization in Kampala. Data collection included semi-structured interviews, photovoice, and photocollaging. Ethical consent was obtained from all individuals participating in the research and for the display of images.Results and Findings The findings demonstrate that a variety of emotions experienced as positive (e.g. love of sport) or negative (e.g. stress) stimulate SDP-related work to change relations between host communities and refugees. The findings also illustrate that emotions experienced positively (e.g. nostalgia, happiness) were generated via SDP activities, including creation of sport groups related to homelands and conflict resolution among refugees and host communities. Three mechanisms – diverting, bonding, peacemaking – are identified that enabled SDP-related practices to transform refugees' emotions. The resulting positive emotional state helped to undermine the institution of social inequality between the host community and refugees.Implications This study advances theoretical development of institutional theory in sport management by accounting for the lived experience and emotions that play a role in SDP-related institutional work.KEYWORDS: Emotionsinstitutional worksport for development and peaceforced migrationrefugees Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We use Greenwood et al.'s (Citation2008) definition of institution: 'more-or-less taken-for-granted repetitive social behaviour that is underpinned by normative systems and cognitive understandings that give meaning to social exchange and thus enable self-reproducing social order' (p. 4–5).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarship (CGS), a CGS-Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement, and by funds received from the North American Society for Sport Management (NASSM) Doctoral Research Grant Program.
McSweeney et al. (Mon,) studied this question.