Key result
3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA improved vessel sharpness of the right coronary artery compared to single-phase CMRA (mean score 4.6 vs 3.6, P=0.031).
Why the study?
To overcome visual delineation challenges of the quietest heart phase by evaluating a new 3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA technique for coronary artery depiction and simultaneous functional assessment.
Does 3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA improve depiction of coronary arteries and assessment of cardiac function compared to single-phase CMRA and 2D SSFP in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=10)
Does 3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA improve depiction of coronary arteries and assessment of cardiac function compared to single-phase CMRA and 2D SSFP in healthy volunteers?
3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA improves vessel sharpness of the right coronary artery and allows simultaneous functional assessment comparable to 2D SSFP in healthy volunteers.
Background Coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) is a robust tool for delineation of the coronary artery anatomy. In order to overcome the issue of visual delineation of the quietest heart phase, we implemented a new three-dimensional (3D) multi-phase whole-heart CMRA. Purpose To evaluate the 3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA technique for depiction of the coronary arteries and simultaneous assessment of cardiac function. Material and Methods Ten healthy volunteers were included in a prospective study comprising 3D whole-heart CMRA with multiple-phase acquisition on 1.5-T MR. As a reference for coronary artery imaging, single-phase CMRA was performed. Furthermore, two-dimensional SSFP imaging was performed for functional assessment. Vessel sharpness (VS) was rated on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) and ventricular volumes were assessed in respective sequences. Results VS scores were rated higher in multi-phase compared to single-phase CMRA: mean VS of the RCA was 4.6 ± 0.52 in multi-phase and 3.6 ± 1.17 in single-phase CMRA (z = –2.232, P = 0.031). Mean VS of the LM was 4.2 ± 0.79 vs. 3.7 ± 0.82 (z = –2.236, P = 0.063), of the LCX was 3.8 ± 1.03 vs. 3.4 ± 1.01 (z = –1.265, P = 0.359), and of the LAD was 3.9 ± 0.59 vs. 3.9 ± 0.32 (z = 0, P = 1.00). In functional assessment, the mean difference between multi-phase CMRA and two-dimensional SSFP imaging for assessing the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (LV-EDV) was –0.38% (95% CI -2.41–1.64) and for the right ventricular EDV –0.28 (95% CI -3.51–2.96). Conclusion The 3D multi-phase CMRA approach allows a time efficient depiction of the coronary arteries and a coeval functional assessment, with an improved vessel sharpness of the coronaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zitzelsberger et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=10). 3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA vs. Single-phase CMRA was evaluated on Vessel sharpness of the right coronary artery (RCA) on a 5-point Likert scale (p=0.031). 3D multi-phase whole-heart CMRA improved vessel sharpness of the right coronary artery compared to single-phase CMRA (mean score 4.6 vs 3.6, P=0.031).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: