Why the study?
Does unsupervised free-breathing 3-dimensional MR imaging provide comparable image quality and quantitative volumetric/flow data to conventional 2D imaging in patients with congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=5)
Single-blind (assessors)
No
Does unsupervised free-breathing 3-dimensional MR imaging provide comparable image quality and quantitative volumetric/flow data to conventional 2D imaging in patients with congenital heart disease?
Supports feasibility of free-breathing 3D CMR in congenital heart disease; leaves open validation versus 2D imaging.
Methods Five patients with CHD were included in this pilot study (table 2 in Figure 2). The FB MR studies were performed on a Philips Acheiva 1.5T magnet using a 5-channel phased array coil (see Table 1 in Figure 1) 1. Respiratory synchronized [1], time-resolved MRA 2. Equilibrium phase MRA 3. 3D cine SSFP 4.4D phase contrast (PC) flow imaging 5.3D whole-heart single phase SSFP (coronary) Comparative data was obtained using conventional 2D cine RT SSFP sequences [2] in the VLA, 4 chamber and short axis planes, and 2D PC imaging. Data Analysis: Image quality assessment and quantitative volumetric and flow analysis were performed by three blinded, experienced users. MRA images were graded using a semi-quantitative scale from 1-5 for relevant imaging targets in CHD [1], with 1: excellent, no limitations, and 5: non-diagnostic. The clinical scoring system for 2D and 3D cine SSFP was based on bloodmyocardial contrast, endocardial edge definition and inter-slice alignment [2]. Paired t-test analysis was performed on LV and RV volumes obtained by an experienced observer using the same software
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnamurthy et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Congenital heart disease (n=5). Free-breathing 3D MRI protocol vs. Conventional 2D MRI sequences was evaluated on Clinical score for image quality (1=excellent to 5=non-diagnostic).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: