Key result
Presenting in sinus rhythm on the day of atrial flutter ablation did not significantly increase the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias within 1 year compared to presenting in atrial flutter (17.0% vs 13.8%, p=0.57).
Why the study?
Does presenting rhythm (atrial flutter vs sinus rhythm) on the day of atrial flutter ablation affect the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias within 1 year?
Cohort (n=188)
No
Does presenting rhythm (atrial flutter vs sinus rhythm) on the day of atrial flutter ablation affect the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias within 1 year?
The presenting rhythm on the day of atrial flutter ablation does not significantly impact the 1-year incidence of new atrial arrhythmias, despite differences in baseline characteristics and intraprocedural AF induction.
Presenting rhythm was not associated with new arrhythmias after flutter ablation; leaves open optimal timing strategies pending prospective trials.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus is a proven therapy for typical atrial flutter (AFl); however, in some patients, new atrial arrhythmias (AA) may occur after AFl ablation. This study explored the difference in the occurrence of spontaneous AA after AFl ablation as a function of the patient's presenting rhythm on the day of the AFl ablation. A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent AFl ablation at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas was performed. A total of 188 subjects were included; 50% (94) presented in AFl (Group AFl) on the day of the ablation procedure and 94 presented in sinus rhythm (SR; Group SR). Group AFl patients were older (P < 0.001), more likely to have diabetes (P = 0.03), and more likely to have undergone previous heart surgery (P = 0.03). The median size of the left atrium was 4 cm (range 2.8–6.8) in Group AFl compared with 3.8 cm (range 2.6–5.6) in Group SR (P = 0.009). Atrial fibrillation was induced during the ablation procedure in 7.5% and 21.3% of patients in Groups AFl and SR, respectively (P = 0.007). Overall, 29 of 188 (15.4%) patients developed new AA within 1 year of the procedure, 13.8% in Group AFl vs 17.0% in Group SR (P = 0.57). In conclusion, patients presenting for AFl ablation in SR were younger and healthier but had more atrial fibrillation induced during their ablation procedure, with a trend toward more postablation AA due to additional arrhythmia substrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vasudevan et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Atrial flutter (n=188). Presenting in sinus rhythm on the day of ablation vs. Presenting in atrial flutter on the day of ablation was evaluated on Development of new atrial arrhythmias within 1 year of the procedure (p=0.57). Presenting in sinus rhythm on the day of atrial flutter ablation did not significantly increase the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias within 1 year compared to presenting in atrial flutter (17.0% vs 13.8%, p=0.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: