Why the study?
Atypical atrial flutter prevalence is rising due to increasing AF ablations and cardiac surgeries, prompting investigation into ablation outcomes amid recent mapping and ablation changes.
What is the recurrence-free survival rate following a single electrophysiology study and ablation for atypical atrial flutter?
What is the recurrence-free survival rate following a single electrophysiology study and ablation for atypical atrial flutter?
Despite a high acute termination rate of 83.7%, the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate following atypical atrial flutter ablation is only 57.2%, highlighting significant underlying substrate abnormalities.
Recurrence remains frequent after atypical flutter ablation; hypothesis-generating for substrate-targeted strategies.
Background: Atypical Atrial Flutter (AAFL) prevalence is increasing due to the escalating Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablations and cardiac surgeries. We wanted to explore the outcome of the AAFL ablation, considering the recent changes in mapping and ablation. Methods: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Mayo Clinic hospital. We retrospectively studied 419 patients who had undergone AAFL ablation at Mayo Clinic from January 2017 to June 2022. Thirteen patients declined research authorization, and 19 patients were lost to follow-up during the 90-day blanking period, resulting in a sample size of 387. The median follow-up time for patients was 25.7 months (95% CI 23.7, 32.3). Results: Recurrent symptoms with documentation of atrial arrhythmia Occurred in 226/387 (58.4%) patients, of which 151/226 (66.8%) occurred within the first year. The median time to recurrence was 8.5 months (max 57.8 months). Eleven patients died during the study period, 9 of whom experienced recurrence prior to death. Overall, the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) time was 16.6 months (95% CI 13.2, 20.0) with a 1-year RFS rate of 57.2% (95% CI 52.2, 62.7%). Acute termination occurred 324/387 (83.7%) during the ablation. The 1-year RFS rate was 58.9% (95% CI 53.5%, 64.9%) for patients with acute termination and 49.0% (95% CI 37.9%, 63.4%) for those without acute termination. The rate was not significantly different based on acute termination status (p = 0.11). Conclusions: The one-year RFS rate of 57.2% following AAFL ablation, even though 83.7% achieved acute termination during the procedure, signifies the extent of the underlying substrate abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mekala et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: