Key result
FIRM-guided ablation significantly increased single-procedure freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to conventional ablation alone (82.4% vs 44.9%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM) mapping and ablation improve the single procedure rate of atrial fibrillation elimination compared to conventional ablation?
Does Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM) mapping and ablation improve the single procedure rate of atrial fibrillation elimination compared to conventional ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 82.4% vs 44.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
FIRM mapping and ablation represents a targeted approach that may significantly improve single-procedure success rates for atrial fibrillation elimination by targeting patient-specific sustaining mechanisms.
Supports FIRM in refractory AF; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important and exciting therapy whose results remain suboptimal. Although most clinical trials show that ablation eliminates AF more effectively than medications, it is disappointing that the continued single procedural success remains ≈50% despite the substantial advances that have taken place in imaging, catheter positioning and energy delivery. Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM), on the other hand, offers the opportunity to precisely define and then ablate patient-specific sustaining mechanisms for AF, rather than trying to eliminate all possible AF triggers. For over a decade, electrophysiologists have described cases in which AF terminates after only limited ablation - usually that cannot be explained by 'random' meandering wavelets. Indeed, recent studies from several laboratories show that all forms of clinical AF are typically 'driven' by stable electrical rotors and focal sources, not by multiple meandering waves. FIRM mapping enables an operator to place a catheter at typically 1-3 predicted sites in the atria, and with <5-10 minutes of RF ablation, terminate AF and potentially render it non-inducible. Several independent laboratories have now shown that such FIRM ablation alone can terminate or substantially slow AF in >80% of patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF and increase the single procedure rate of AF elimination from 50% with PV isolation alone to >80%. Ongoing studies hint that FIRM only ablation, enabling ablation times in the range observed for typical atrial flutter, may also achieve these high success rates without subsequent trigger ablation. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art on FIRM mapping and ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sehra et al. (2013) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation (n=92). FIRM-guided ablation vs. Conventional ablation (FIRM-blinded) was evaluated on Single-procedure AF elimination (p=<0.001). FIRM-guided ablation significantly increased single-procedure freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to conventional ablation alone (82.4% vs 44.9%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: