Key result
Women undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were significantly younger than men (53.7 vs 57.7 years) and received a lower radiation dose.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation is the therapy of choice for AVNRT, but gender-related differences among patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway needed to be analyzed.
Are there sex-related differences in procedural characteristics and outcomes among patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia?
Observational (n=147)
Are there sex-related differences in procedural characteristics and outcomes among patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia?
In patients undergoing RFCA for AVNRT, women present at a younger age and receive lower radiation doses than men, though overall procedural effectiveness is high.
Women present younger for AVNRT ablation with lower radiation exposure than men; observational data leave open whether sex-specific factors influence outcomes or safety.
Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The relatively ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs and the predominant young age makes the catheter ablation the therapy of choice in many patients. This results in predominance of this arrhythmia in electrophysiological labs. The aim of the study was to analyze the gender-related differences among patients undergoing the radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow pathway entrance to the atrioventricular node. Material and methods: The study group comprised of 147 consecutive patients with diagnosed atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, who underwent the radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of slow pathway. Patients have been divided into 2 groups, based on sex. Results: The overall 97.3% of effectiveness of RFCA was observed. Women were significantly younger than men (53.7 +/-17.2 vs. 57.7 +/-9.8 years) with lower radiation dose (2383.5 +/-1993.2 vs. 2891.6 +/-2377.1 cGyxcm2). Conclusions: Younger age of women in comparison to men during RFCA of AVNRT reflects earlier onset of symptoms in women. Gender does not affect the time of fluoroscopy, but the higher rate of inducible tachycardia after RFCA in women may suggest the existence of anatomical difficulties or the operator's apprehensions. Sex-related difference in radiation dose that we have observed may result from the greater volume of the men's chest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sokołowska et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=147). Female sex (undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation) vs. Male sex (undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation) was evaluated on Radiation dose (cGy x cm2) (p=<0.05). Women undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were significantly younger than men (53.7 vs 57.7 years) and received a lower radiation dose.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: