Why the study?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation have similar efficacy and safety for treating AVNRT in elderly patients compared to younger patients?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation have similar efficacy and safety for treating AVNRT in elderly patients compared to younger patients?
Radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT is as safe and effective in elderly patients (≥65 years) as it is in younger patients, with no significant increase in complications such as AV block.
Supports RFCA for elderly AVNRT; observational data leave open need for randomized confirmation.
Background and Objectives:Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular supraventricular tachycardias in both the general population and elderly patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for treating AVNRT in the elderly. Subjects and Methods:This study included 273 consecutive symptomatic AVNRT patients who underwent RFCA for the slow-pathway. The study population was divided into two groups: group I patients were younger than 65 years (n=227, average age: 44.6±12.9 years, male:female=89:138) and group II patients were older than 65 years (n=46, average age: 69.0±3.6, male:female=9:37). We compared the baseline clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics and the outcomes of RFCA between the two groups. Results:The prevalence of a baseline prolonged PR interval (>200 ms) was not different between the 2 groups (1.8% vs. 6.5%, p>0.05). The baseline sinus cycle length, QT interval and AVNRT cycle length were significantly longer in group II than in group 1 (799.3±146.1 ms vs. 864.3±159.8 ms, 374.2±42.1 ms vs. 397.6±40.4 ms, 351.3±43.2 ms vs. 384.9±57.0 ms, respectively p 0.05). One patient in group I required permanent pacemaker implantation. Conclusion:RFCA in elderly patients is safe and effective as in younger patients. Therefore, performing RFCA for treating AVNRT should also be considered in the elderly patients. (Korean Circulation J 2006;36:354-358)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: