PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2007Journal of Mixed Methods Research152 citations

Mixed Methods in Intervention Research: Theory to Adaptation

View Full Paper
BNBonnie K. NastasiTulane UniversityJHJohn H. HitchcockAlbany State UniversitySSSreeroopa SarkarWalden University

Key Points

  • To outline the application of mixed methods research designs across multiyear programmatic initiatives aimed at integrating cultural specificity into evidence-based interventions.
  • Categorized five distinct mixed methods research designs mapping to specific phases: formative research, theory development and testing, instrument development/validation, program development/evaluation, and outcome evaluation.
  • Demonstrated practical applications using a multiyear programmatic initiative focused on ethnographically informed psychological assessment and culturally tailored intervention development in Sri Lanka.
  • Sequential qualitative-to-quantitative designs successfully establish culturally grounded concepts prior to statistical measurement and psychometric validation.
  • Iterative and concurrent mixed methods frameworks facilitate the systematic translation, adaptation, and rigorous evaluation of interventions in culturally diverse settings.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the application of mixed methods research designs to multiyear programmatic research and development projects whose goals include integration of cultural specificity when generating or translating evidence-based practices. The authors propose a set of five mixed methods designs related to different phases of program development research: (a) formative research, Qual →/+ Quan; (b) theory development or modification and testing, Qual → Quan →/+ Qual → Quan ... Qual → Quan; (c) instrument development and validation, Qual → Quan; (d) program development and evaluation, Qual →/+ Quan →/+ Qual →/+ Quan ... Qual →/+ Quan, or Qual →← Quan; and (e) evaluation research, Qual + Quan. We illustrate the application of these designs to creating and validating ethnographically informed psychological assessment measures and developing and evaluating culturally specific intervention programs within a multiyear research program conducted in the country of Sri Lanka.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nastasi et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10d1c6d06b5b96589f979bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Participatory Model of Mental Health Programming: Lessons Learned from Work in a Developing Country1998 · 80 citations
  2. 2Realworld Evaluation: Working under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints2007 · 114 citations
  3. 3Evaluation Models: New Directions for Evaluation2001 · 149 citations
  4. 4SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research2010 · 6,177 citations
  5. 5Evaluation Models2001 · 185 citations