This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed acute care utilization and health care costs among rural Medicaid enrollees in a national sample; fewer still have examined the relationship of health care utilization with different levels of rurality and enrollee race/ethnicity. OBJECTIVES: This study's objective is to compare Medicaid acute care utilization patterns by race/ethnicity and rurality interactions to identify rural populations with higher health care needs or receiving potentially insufficient care. RESEARCH DESIGNS: We used the 2019 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF), which includes inpatient, outpatient, and prescription data on all Medicaid enrollees. We ran zero-inflated poisson, negative binomial, and generalized linear models to examine the association between enrollee rurality (defined using Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes) and race/ethnicity and 4 health care utilization outcomes. SUBJECTS: All Medicaid enrollees with 12 months of full-scope coverage in T-MSIS TAF (N=50,631,371). MEASURES: Our outcome measures included rate of emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient stays, inpatient length-of-stay (LOS), and spending per-member per-month. RESULTS: Rural Medicaid enrollees had lower rates (12.6%-18.2% lower) of inpatient stays compared with urban enrollees, only Medicaid enrollees in Isolated (the most remote) rural areas had lower rates (11.0% reduction) of ED compared with those in urban areas. Average inpatient LOS and spending were both lower for rural Medicaid enrollees. Utilization varied by enrollee race/ethnicity, with the lowest utilization among Hispanic enrollees. CONCLUSION: Rural Medicaid enrollees had generally lower acute care utilization and expenditures; however, heterogeneity by rurality and race/ethnicity suggests that some rural populations have higher health care needs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friedman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: