What question did this study set out to answer?

Examine how material possessions function as extensions and symbolic representations of identity across biological, psychological, and social constructionist frameworks.

April 1, 1993Choice Reviews Online

The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Theoretical review uncovers the symbolic role of material possessions in personal identity, indicating that ownership deeply shapes modern social self-concept.

Key Points

Examine how material possessions function as extensions and symbolic representations of identity across biological, psychological, and social constructionist frameworks.
Theoretical analysis evaluating biological models of property instincts alongside psychological paradigms of the extended self.
Synthesis of social constructionist perspectives on how material context, gender, and social-material status influence perceived identity.
Material possessions serve as critical physical extensions of the self and symbolic vehicles for displaying group affiliation and social status.
Surrounding material environments shape how external observers evaluate an individual's identity, driving a cultural paradox between Western idealism and consumer materialism.

Cite This Study

A 1993 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10d2d15e6663f9d2647ebe https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-4685

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Theoretical review uncovers the symbolic role of material possessions in personal identity, indicating that ownership deeply shapes modern social self-concept.

The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider