Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychoanalysis has historically been understood to evince a suspicion or hostility to all ideas or ideals of “religion.” But in recent years, a new analytic tradition seems to be emerging, characterized by being spiritually sensitive. In this article, I briefly explore the budding theories of development, transference, and psychopathology as they are newly understood by spiritually sensitive psychoanalysts. I expound on the way they see the healthy personality and how this affects their therapeutic goals. I suggest four main clusters of such goals: 1) changing problematic patterns of faith, 2) developing a moral stance of compassion and responsibility, 3) lessening preoccupation with the self, and 4) helping patients get nearer to the numinous. Finally, I show how spiritually sensitive psychoanalysis's contribution to the spiritual person is unique, compared with other spiritually sensitive psychologies or spiritual traditions. I also discuss the tensions arising between this emerging field of thought, and the existing body of psychoanalytic knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gideon Lev (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: