This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Humanitarian agencies are increasingly engaged in research in conflict and post-conflict settings. This is justified by the need to improve the quality of assistance provided in these settings and to collect evidence of the highest standard to inform advocacy and policy change. The instability of conflict-affected areas, and the heightened vulnerability of populations caught in conflict, calls for careful consideration of the research methods employed, the levels of evidence sought, and ethical requirements. Special attention needs to be placed on the feasibility and necessity of doing research in conflict-settings, and the harm-benefit ratio for potential research participants.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ford et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: