Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article explores the gender regime that regulates access to, and the biased power distribution embedded in, political office at the local level, a seriously underresearched unit of analysis. Ultimately, it aims to contribute to wider reflection on the informal rules entrenched in political parties' candidate selection processes. I do so by analyzing candidate lists in the context of the application of a quota law. The article is empirically grounded in Spanish subnational politics. I find that quota laws do not eliminate gender differences among parties: Inequality is less marked in organizations with long-established gender quotas than in those where recent quotas, targets, or goals are used. Nonetheless, the prevalence of pervasive sexist organizational cultures within the parties impedes a greater efficacy of gender quotas. Finally, I show that women are more likely to recruit women than men and that women's agency in its diverse forms boosts female representation.
Tània Verge (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: