This paper considers the underlying principles of depicting disease incidence on geographical maps and uses them to attempt a comparative classification of methods. After a discussion of the possibilities for incorporating time, we consider projection methods, some of which have been used to portray information in a manner supposed to be independent of population density. We then distinguish between non-parametric and model-based methods, including models for areal data using Bayesian ideas. Data in point form are also discussed and it is argued that the relative risk function provides a fundamental model useful for assessing different methods as a whole, some of which are known to be flawed and many of which are untested as regards their statistical properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. F. Bithell (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: