Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This national implementation study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Tier 2 structured literacy teaching set within a multi-tiered system of support. Case-controlled matching was used to determine the impact of the implementation for 1,265 5-year-old children. One comparison group included 1,265 children who were matched to the experimental group on demographic and reading variables (i.e., a reading-matched control). The second comparison group included 1,265 children who were matched on demographic factors but presented with relatively stronger reading skills (i.e., demographically matched control). Tier 2 participants scored higher in reading and spelling than their reading-matched peers following intervention. Further, their reading and spelling did not differ from the demographically matched control group following intervention. Results suggest that timely and effective Tier 2 teaching support can be delivered at scale. The critical role of professional development and resourcing to facilitate implementation of evidence-based structured literacy teaching practices at a national level is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNeill et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: