Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We show how the tension between cooperation and competition affects the dynamics of learning alliances. ‘Private benefits’ and ‘common benefits’ differ in the incentives that they create for investment in learning. The competitive aspects of alliances are most severe when a firm's ratio of private to common benefits is high. We introduce a measure, ‘relative scope’ of a firm in an alliance, to show that the opportunity set of each firm outside an alliance crucially impacts its behavior within the alliance. Finally, we suggest why firms might deviate from the theoretically optimal behavior patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanna et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: