Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chromatographic techniques were used to separate secondary products generated by thermal degradation of methyl linoleate hydroperoxides (MLHP). The MLHP were obtained by oxidation, selected, and concentrated by solid‐phase extraction (SPE) and thin‐layer chromatography (TLC). The purified MLHP were then thermo‐degraded in the gas‐chromatographic glass liner and analyzed on‐line by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). The MLHP were also thermodegraded and collected in a short silicic acid‐packed column, eluted, separated by TLC, and then analyzed by GC. By considering the elution in TLC, the GC retention times and the GC‐MS analyses, it was possible to characterize the mono‐ and the dioxygenated secondary products, particularly those having a boiling point higher than methyl linoleate. The peaks that corresponded to the mono‐oxygenated products (epoxy, hydroxy, and keto) were identified, and, on the basis of their MS spectra, molecular structures were proposed. A specific elution order was suggested for keto derivatives: 9‐keto,Δ 10,12 ‐ and 13‐keto,Δ 9,11 ‐octadecadienoate. The hydroxy derivatives, which show the typical fragmentations of 9‐hydroxy,Δ 10,12 ‐ and 13‐hydroxy,Δ 9,11 ‐octadecadienoate, were also identified. On the other hand, identification of the di‐oxygenated compounds was more difficult, and, therefore, it was not possible to indicate each positional isomer; however, their elution order could be epoxy‐hydroxy and epoxy‐keto derivatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toschi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: