Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methodological analysis demonstrates a distortion-based local sensitivity measure in Bayesian statistical models, highlighting tractable evaluation of likelihood and prior robustness.
Robust Bayesian analysis has been mainly devoted to detecting and measuring robustness w.r.t. the prior distribution. Many contributions in the literature aim to define suitable classes of priors which allow the computation of variations of quantities of interest while the prior changes within those classes. The literature has devoted much less attention to the robustness of Bayesian methods w.r.t. the likelihood function due to mathematical and computational complexity, and because it is often arguably considered a more objective choice compared to the prior. In this contribution, we propose a new approach to Bayesian local robustness, mainly focusing on robustness w.r.t. the likelihood function. Successively, we extend it to account for robustness w.r.t. the prior, as well as the prior and the likelihood jointly. This approach is based on the notion of distortion function introduced in the literature on risk theory. The novel robustness measure is a local sensitivity measure that turns out to be very tractable and easy to compute for several classes of distortion functions. Asymptotic properties are derived, and numerical experiments illustrate the theory and its applicability for modelling purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: