Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of this research was an exploratory one. Close observations of a team faced with a complex and prolonged task in a management simulation exercise resulted in comprehensive discussions of how organizations learn. Each of these discussions lacked coverage for some of the things that had been observed in the game; however, a synthesis was proposed which makes learning in organization a product of different kinds of stress. It presumes that organizational learning is sporadic and step-wise rather than continuous and gradual and that learning what preferences and goals are goes hand-in-hand with learning how to achieve them. It postulates separate mechanisms to control adaptation of the organization as a total system. Links are also proposed to show how the interactions between subsystem and total-system adaptation determine the overall course of organizational learning and development. (Author)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cangelosi et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: