Key result
In patients with diabetes and CAD, a high PAI-1/tPA ratio was associated with a higher risk of major cardiac events when treated with PCI compared to medical therapy (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.16-2.93; P=0.01).
Why the study?
To assess whether the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1/tissue plasminogen activator ratio is useful for optimizing cardiac treatment strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease.
Does early revascularization compared to medical therapy reduce major cardiac events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, depending on their PAI-1/tPA ratio?
Observational (n=2,170)
Does early revascularization compared to medical therapy reduce major cardiac events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, depending on their PAI-1/tPA ratio?
Effect estimate: HR 1.84 (95% CI 1.16-2.93)
p-value: p=0.01
A high PAI-1/tPA ratio identifies patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease who may have worse outcomes with PCI compared to intensive medical therapy.
Background This study aimed to assess whether the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1/tissue plasminogen activator ( PAI -1/ tPA ) ratio as a prothrombotic state is useful for optimizing cardiac treatment strategy. Methods and Results Using BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) trial data, we used a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate hazard ratios with 95% CI s for cardiac events in patients receiving early revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) or medical therapy, separately in patients with low (n=1276) and high (n=894) PAI -1/ tPA ratios. The primary outcome was major cardiac events, which was a composite end point including cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. The mean± SD follow-up period was 4.1±1.7 years. The risk of major cardiac events in patients with high PAI -1/ tPA ratio was significantly higher when receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI , 1.16-2.93; P=0.01) than when receiving medical therapy, whereas that in patients with low PAI -1/ tPA ratio did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI , 0.66-1.36; P=0.77); the interaction between the cardiac treatment strategy and PAI -1/ tPA ratio was significant ( P=0.02). However, regardless of the PAI -1/ tPA ratio, major cardiac event risk seemed to be lower in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting than in those receiving medical therapy. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, this study demonstrated that those with high PAI -1/ tPA ratio were at higher risks of major cardiac events when treated with percutaneous coronary intervention than when treated with intensive medical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsujimoto et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease (n=2,170). Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. Medical therapy was evaluated on Major cardiac events (composite of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction) (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.16-2.93, p=0.01). In patients with diabetes and CAD, a high PAI-1/tPA ratio was associated with a higher risk of major cardiac events when treated with PCI compared to medical therapy (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.16-2.93; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: