Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty

Alison E. Martin; Cathryn Vasseleu

doi:10.2307/3738678

October 1, 2002The Modern Language Review

Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This work examines the interconnections between vision and touch through the perspectives of Irigaray, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty.
Philosophical analysis of concepts from noted philosophers.
Exploration of the embodied experiences of vision and touch.
Discussion of the implications of light in relation to perception and sensory experience.
Vision and touch are intricately linked as forms of perception.
Embodied experiences shape how light and touch interact in understanding eroticism.
The philosophical implications suggest a deeper connection between sensory experiences and existence.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Philosophical analysis explores the interplay between vision and touch, highlighting their embodied significance.

Abstract

Acknowledgements TRUE LIGHT 1. Introduction CARNAL LIGHT 2. Introductory comments 3. Living Flesh 4. Vision in the Flesh 5. Touching Flesh PERVERSE LIGHT 6. Introductory comments 7. Scintillating Lighting 8. The Lightness of Touch 9. Illuminating Passion EROTIC LIGHT 10.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Martin et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10e84bacd1dbe064649a82 https://doi.org/10.2307/3738678

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading