Key result
Remote pacemaker monitoring shows no difference in communication experiences versus hospital monitoring in older adults.
Why the study?
Effective communication is essential for quality healthcare, prompting this study to explore communication experiences during remote monitoring of older adults with a pacemaker.
Does remote monitoring improve communication experiences compared to hospital monitoring in older adults with pacemakers?
RCT (n=49)
Open-label
Randomized
Does remote monitoring improve communication experiences compared to hospital monitoring in older adults with pacemakers?
Remote monitoring of pacemakers provides positive communication experiences comparable to in-hospital monitoring, supporting its use as a safe and convenient telehealth option.
Supports remote monitoring as a comparable alternative for pacemaker follow-up in older adults; confirms equivalent communication experiences in this RCT.
As effective communication is a key ingredient for the provision of quality healthcare services, this study aimed to explore the communication experiences in the remote monitoring of older adults with a pacemaker. The study was based on a non-masked randomized observational design. The Healthcare Communication Questionnaire and in-depth interviews were conducted for data collection. A total of 49 patients participated in the study. The study findings reveal overall positive communication experiences by pacemaker users in remote monitoring with no significant differences from users in hospital monitoring. The remote option is perceived as safe and convenient, and communicating with the clinicians from home is considered comfortable and confidential. The study provides insights into the content of communication experiences in telehealth and practical implications in healthcare contexts. In a world that increasingly relies on remote communication, it is crucial to match technologies to patient needs and assess communication with patients. This will ensure the success of new models of care and establish appropriate criteria for the use of telehealth services. These criteria are all relevant in the implementation of health technology in the future as a part of effective patient-centered care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catalán-Matamoros et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Pacemaker users (n=49). Remote monitoring vs. Hospital monitoring was evaluated on Communication experiences. Remote monitoring of older adults with pacemakers yielded positive communication experiences with no significant differences compared to hospital monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health