Key result
Trunk fat accumulation exceeds limb fat across most populations, predisposing males to visceral fat deposition.
Why the study?
Excess body fat impacts obesity-related co-morbidity risk, and the location of fat stores affects the severity of these risks.
How do segmental fat accumulation patterns differ by sex and ethnicity in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=30,587)
Yes
How do segmental fat accumulation patterns differ by sex and ethnicity in adults?
Segmental fat accumulation patterns differ significantly by sex and ethnicity, with males of most ethnicities showing greater trunk fat accumulation, potentially increasing their risk for visceral fat deposition and associated co-morbidities.
Patterns of segmental fat accumulation may inform sex- and ethnicity-specific cardiometabolic risk assessment; cross-sectional data leave open prospective validation.
Summary Excess fat on the body impacts obesity‐related co‐morbidity risk; however, the location of fat stores affects the severity of these risks. The purpose of this study was to examine segmental fat accumulation patterns by sex and ethnicity using international datasets. An amalgamated and cross‐calibrated dataset of dual x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA)‐measured variables compiled segmental mass for bone mineral content (BMC), lean mass (LM), and fat mass (FM) for each participant; percentage of segment fat (PSF) was calculated as PSF segment = (FM segment /(BMC segment + LM segment + FM segment )) × 100. A total of 30 587 adults ( N = 16 490 females) from 13 datasets were included. A regression model was used to examine differences in regional fat mass and PSF. All populations followed the same segmental fat mass accumulation in the ascending order with statistical significance (arms < legs < trunk), except for Hispanic/Latinx males (arms < [legs = trunk]). Relative fat accumulation patterns differed between those with greater PSF in the appendages (Arab, Mexican, Asian, Black, American Caucasian, European Caucasian, and Australasian Caucasian females; Black males) and those with greater PSF in the trunk (Mexican, Asian, American Caucasian, European Caucasian, and Australasian Caucasian males). Greater absolute and relative fat accumulation in the trunk could place males of most ethnicities in this study at a higher risk of visceral fat deposition and associated co‐morbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Fat accumulation (n=30,587). Sex and ethnicity was evaluated on Differences in regional fat mass and percentage of segment fat (PSF). Segmental fat mass accumulation followed an ascending order (arms < legs < trunk) across all populations except Hispanic/Latinx males, placing most males at higher risk of visceral fat deposition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: