Key result
Impella bridge-to-closure for post-MI VSD is associated with successful repair and ~46% 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Post-infarction ventricular septal defect is a life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction, but few studies report using mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock in this setting.
Does a microaxial transvalvular device (Impella) improve survival to closure in patients with cardiogenic shock due to post-infarction ventricular septal defect?
Case Report (n=13)
Yes
Does a microaxial transvalvular device (Impella) improve survival to closure in patients with cardiogenic shock due to post-infarction ventricular septal defect?
Impella support as a bridge-to-closure in post-infarction VSD may improve clinical stability, with earlier initiation potentially improving survival to closure.
Hypothesis-generating for Impella as bridge-to-closure in post-infarction VSD; prospective trials needed before practice change.
Background: Post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is a rare, life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Few studies report the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for the treatment of cardiogenic shock in this setting. We describe our experience using a microaxial, transvalvular device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) as a bridge-to-closure for PIVSD. Case summary: We identified 13 patients from two centres with cardiogenic shock due to PIVSD who received an Impella device between January 2016 and February 2022. Nine patients were transferred from another hospital, three with MCS devices [two intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), 1 Impella CP]. Eight patients received Impella 5.0, three received Impella 5.5 (one escalated from Impella CP), and two received Impella CP. The median time from AMI to Impella insertion was 5 (3-6) days. Five patients died on Impella support without an attempt to close the ventricular septum (VSD). Seven patients underwent successful VSD closure: six had surgical and one had percutaneous closure. One patient died during attempted percutaneous closure. Time from Impella insertion to VSD closure was 10.5 (7.8-14.0) days. Time from AMI to Impella was 5.0 (2.0-5.3) days in the group that survived to closure, and 6.0 (4.0-7.0) days in those who did not. Thirty-day mortality was 46%. Discussion: Support with Impella improved clinical stability in most patients, yet multi-system organ failure leading to death occurred in many patients. Patients who survived closure had earlier time from AMI to Impella, underscoring that prompt recognition of PIVSD and initiation of MCS may improve survival to surgical or percutaneous closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalli et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Post-infarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock (n=13). Impella device (Impella 5.0, 5.5, or CP) was evaluated on 30-day mortality. Impella mechanical circulatory support as a bridge-to-closure for post-infarction ventricular septal defect was associated with successful closure in 7 of 13 patients and a 30-day mortality of 46%.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: