Key result
Exercise PAWP correlates fairly with LVEDP but shows wide limits of agreement of ~11 mmHg.
Why the study?
Exercise PAWP is used as a surrogate for LVEDP to diagnose HFpEF, but the precision, accuracy, and agreement of exercise PAWP estimates against gold-standard LVEDP remained to be determined.
Does pulmonary artery wedge pressure accurately and precisely estimate left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during exercise in patients with dyspnoea?
Observational (n=46)
Does pulmonary artery wedge pressure accurately and precisely estimate left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during exercise in patients with dyspnoea?
Effect estimate: R2 >0.69
p-value: p=<0.01
PAWP is an accurate but imprecise surrogate for LVEDP during exercise, though the two measures show good diagnostic concordance for HFpEF.
PAWP shows diagnostic concordance with LVEDP during exercise; supports surrogate use in HFpEF evaluation but leaves precision for individual assessment open.
Background Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) during exercise, as a surrogate for left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure (EDP), is used to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, LVEDP is the gold standard to assess LV filling, end-diastolic PAWP (PAWP ED ) is supposed to coincide with LVEDP and mean PAWP throughout the cardiac cycle (PAWP M ) better reflects the haemodynamic load imposed on the pulmonary circulation. The objective of the present study was to determine precision and accuracy of PAWP estimates for LVEDP during exercise, as well as the rate of agreement between these measures. Methods 46 individuals underwent simultaneous right and left heart catheterisation, at rest and during exercise, to confirm/exclude HFpEF. We evaluated: linear regression between LVEDP and PAWP, Bland–Altman graphs, and the rate of concordance of dichotomised LVEDP and PAWP ≥ or < diagnostic thresholds for HFpEF. Results At peak exercise, PAWP M and LVEDP, as well as PAWP ED and LVEDP, were fairly correlated (R 2 >0.69, p<0.01), with minimal bias (+2 and 0 mmHg respectively) but large limits of agreement (±11 mmHg). 89% of individuals had concordant PAWP and LVEDP ≥ or <25 mmHg (Cohen's κ=0.64). Individuals with either LVEDP or PAWP M ≥25 mmHg showed a PAWP M increase relative to cardiac output (CO) changes (PAWP M /CO slope) >2 mmHg·L −1 ·min −1 . Conclusions During exercise, PAWP is accurate but not precise for the estimation of LVEDP. Despite a good rate of concordance, these two measures might occasionally disagree.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baratto et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Dyspnoea / suspected HFpEF (n=46). Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) measurement vs. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) measurement was evaluated on Precision, accuracy, and rate of agreement of PAWP estimates for LVEDP during exercise (R2 >0.69, p=<0.01). During exercise, pulmonary artery wedge pressure was fairly correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (R2 >0.69, p<0.01) with minimal bias but large limits of agreement (±11 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: