Key result
Patients with HFpEF exhibited significantly higher peak exercise pulmonary artery wedge pressure (30 vs. 16 mmHg, P<0.001) and a steeper PAWP/cardiac output slope compared to controls.
Why the study?
Does exercise right heart catheterization reveal a distinct haemodynamic profile in HFpEF patients compared to controls?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,862)
Does exercise right heart catheterization reveal a distinct haemodynamic profile in HFpEF patients compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 30% vs 16%
p-value: p=< 0.001
HFpEF patients exhibit a consistent exercise haemodynamic profile characterized by a steep PAWP rise during exercise, supporting the diagnostic utility of exercise RHC despite methodological heterogeneity across studies.
Variability in exercise haemodynamics across HFpEF cohorts underscores diagnostic uncertainty; leaves open the need for standardized thresholds and prospective validation.
Aims Exercise right heart catheterization (RHC) is considered the gold-standard test to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, exercise RHC is an insufficiently standardized technique, and current haemodynamic thresholds to define HFpEF are not universally accepted. We sought to describe the exercise haemodynamics profile of HFpEF cohorts reported in literature, as compared with control subjects. Methods and results We performed a systematic literature review until December 2020. Studies reporting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) at rest and peak exercise were extracted. Summary estimates of all haemodynamic variables were evaluated, stratified according to body position (supine/upright exercise). The PAWP/cardiac output (CO) slope during exercise was extrapolated. Twenty-seven studies were identified, providing data for 2180 HFpEF patients and 682 controls. At peak exercise, patients with HFpEF achieved higher PAWP (30 [29–31] vs. 16 [15–17] mmHg, P < 0.001) and mean right atrial pressure (P < 0.001) than controls. These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and body position. However, peak PAWP values were highly heterogeneous among the cohorts (I2 = 93%), with a relative overlap with controls. PAWP/CO slope was steeper in HFpEF than in controls (3.75 [3.20–4.28] vs. 0.95 [0.30–1.59] mmHg/L/min, P value < 0.0001), even after adjustment for covariates (P = 0.007). Conclusions Despite methodological heterogeneity, as well as heterogeneity of pooled haemodynamic estimates, the exercise haemodynamic profile of HFpEF patients is consistent across studies and characterized by a steep PAWP rise during exercise. More standardization of exercise haemodynamics may be advisable for a wider application in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baratto et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=2,862). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. Control subjects was evaluated on Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) at peak exercise (p=< 0.001). Patients with HFpEF exhibited significantly higher peak exercise pulmonary artery wedge pressure (30 vs. 16 mmHg, P<0.001) and a steeper PAWP/cardiac output slope compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: