Key result
Drug-coated balloon first followed by cobalt-chromium stent deployment versus a reverse sequence did not significantly differ in 6-month in-segment late lumen loss.
Why the study?
Does a paclitaxel-coated balloon followed by a cobalt-chromium stent improve late lumen loss compared to a stent followed by a balloon in patients with de novo coronary stenosis?
RCT (n=97)
Open-label
Envelope
Yes
Does a paclitaxel-coated balloon followed by a cobalt-chromium stent improve late lumen loss compared to a stent followed by a balloon in patients with de novo coronary stenosis?
The sequence of paclitaxel-coated balloon and cobalt-chromium stent deployment does not significantly affect 6-month angiographic late lumen loss or 12-month clinical outcomes in de novo coronary lesions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Either sequence is acceptable; confirms deployment order does not affect late lumen loss in de novo lesions.
INTRODUCTION: The paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter (DCB) based on the PACCOCATH(®) technology has yielded angiographic and clinical results superior to drug-eluting stents (DES) in situations like in-stent restenosis (ISR) and a trend towards superior results in small coronary vessels and side branches of coronary bifurcations. Using the DCB followed by cobalt-chromium stent (CoCr) deployment or with a reverse sequence may yield different outcomes in terms of late loss. METHODS: 97 patients with de-novo coronary stenosis (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 79.4% male, ≥70%, length: ≤25 mm, vessel diameter: 2.5-4.0 mm) were randomly treated with the DCB (3 μg/mm²) followed by a CoCr-stent or stent first and DCB later. Six-month angiographic and one-year clinical follow-up intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: Angiographic and demographic baseline data was comparable between the two groups. When comparing balloon first versus stent first technique, the primary outcome variables were not statistically different for mean in-segment (0.51 ± 0.56 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.55 mm, p = 0.23) and in-stent (0.52 ± 0.55 mm vs. 0.46 ± 0.52 mm, p = 0.65) late lumen loss. The lesion related 12-month MACE rates were 5/49 (10.2%) and 2/48 (4.2%) (p = 0.44). Lesion related thrombotic events occurred in three patients in balloon first and in one patient in stent first group, two of which were associated with early discontinuation of continuous dual anti-platelet therapy, two with suboptimal PCI, and one each were performed in a thrombotic lesion and a bifurcation type 1.1.0. CONCLUSION: Drug-coated balloon first followed by cobalt chromium stent deployment versus a reverse sequence is not associated with statistically significantly different 6-month angiographic or 12-month clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaul et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in De novo coronary artery lesions (n=97). Drug-coated balloon (DCB) followed by cobalt-chromium (CoCr) stent vs. Cobalt-chromium (CoCr) stent followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) was evaluated on In-segment late lumen loss at 6 months (mm) (Mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.39, p=0.23). Drug-coated balloon first followed by cobalt-chromium stent deployment versus a reverse sequence did not significantly differ in 6-month in-segment late lumen loss.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: