Key result
Coronary endothelial dysfunction linked to ~287% higher incident AF risk in nonobstructive CAD.
Why the study?
CAD risk factors are associated with both AF and coronary endothelial dysfunction, but whether coronary endothelial dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of incident AF in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive CAD remained unknown.
Does coronary endothelial dysfunction increase the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=300)
Does coronary endothelial dysfunction increase the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: OR 3.87 (95% CI 1.27-47.0)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.3% vs 2.3%
Coronary endothelial dysfunction is independently associated with a significantly increased risk of developing incident atrial fibrillation in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.
May aid AF risk stratification in nonobstructive CAD; leaves causal role and therapeutic implications open.
Background Coronary artery disease risk factors are associated with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and coronary endothelial dysfunction ( CED ). We hypothesized that CED is associated with increased risk of incident AF among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Methods and Results Three hundred patients with chest pain, nonobstructive coronary artery disease, and no history of AF underwent intracoronary acetylcholine infusion for evaluation of baseline epicardial (decrease in mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter in response to acetylcholine) and microvascular (<50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to acetylcholine) CED . Primary outcome was incident AF over a mean follow‐up period of 10.5±5.5 years. Mean age was 53.3±10.8 years, and 70% were women. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between patients with CED (n=256) and those with normal endothelial function (n=44). Overall, 35 of 300 (12%) patients developed AF , among whom 34 of 35 (97%) had CED at baseline. Compared with normal endothelial function, the presence of CED was associated with 11% increased absolute risk and 5.8‐fold increased relative risk of incident AF . Moreover, CED ( odds ratio , 3.87; 95% CI , 1.27–47.0) and increased (>34 mL/m 2 ) left atrial volume index (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI , 1.60–9.11) were independent predictors of incident AF . Conclusions Patients with normal coronary endothelial function, as compared with those with CED and similar AF risk factors, have significantly lower incidence of AF on long‐term follow‐up. The potential mechanistic link between vascular dysfunction and AF development warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corban et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (n=300). Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) vs. Normal endothelial function was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.27-47.0). Coronary endothelial dysfunction was an independent predictor of incident atrial fibrillation (OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.27-47.0) in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: