Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study endeavours to (a) develop a comprehensive interpretive structural modelling (ISM) toolkit containing sufficient details about the suitability and procedural aspects of each ISM approach and offer points of reference for budding researchers, (b) highlight the compatibility of ISM approaches with other qualitative and quantitative approaches, and (c) chalk-out an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on an extensive review of 74 studies where researchers have used one or more ISM approaches. These studies span across the different industry sectors. Findings There exists a huge void in terms of the methodological synthesis of ISM approaches. ISM approaches are frequently used in sync with other qualitative and quantitative approaches. Furthermore, it highlights the need of improving the robustness of the proposed ISM models by sharing the critical details of research process. Research limitations/implications Being a review-based work, it could not illustrate the discussed ISM approaches with real data. However, it offers a research agenda for the prospective researchers. Practical implications The prerequisites, pitfalls, suitability and the procedural aspects of various ISM approaches contained in this toolkit are equally useful for the academicians as well as practitioners. Originality/value In the absence of a synthesized framework, this study contributes a comprehensive ISM toolkit which will help the researchers to choose a suitable ISM approach in a given case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbas et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: