Key result
Maladaptive emotion regulation moderates psychological stress impacts and is linked to higher hair cortisol levels.
Why the study?
This study explored the role of emotion regulation as a moderator in the relationship between stressors and adjustment outcomes while identifying relevant stressors in adolescents.
Does emotion regulation moderate the association between stressors and psychological or biological outcomes in adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=214)
Does emotion regulation moderate the association between stressors and psychological or biological outcomes in adolescents?
p-value: p=< .05
Maladaptive emotion regulation moderates the impact of stressors on psychological outcomes in adolescents, suggesting that training in effective emotion regulation could increase stress resilience.
Hypothesis-generating for emotion regulation training in stressed adolescents; prospective trials needed before practice implications.
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the role of emotion regulation (ER) as a moderator in the stressor-adjustment outcome relationship while identifying the relevant stressors. METHODS: In 214 adolescents (10-18 years; 51.4% boys), stressors (parent and peer relations, negative events), psychological outcomes (adolescent perceived stress, psychopathology symptoms, negative affect), and biological measures related to the stress response (hair cortisol [HC], heart rate variability [HRV]) as well as ER strategies-maladaptive (MalER), adaptive (AdER), and their ratio (Mal/AdER)-were measured and analyzed via linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Parental rejection and bullying were the stressors with the strongest association with psychological outcomes (β range = |0.217-0.352|, p < .05). In addition, parental rejection was associated with HC (β = 0.242, p = .035), whereas none of the stressors were associated with HRV. MalER was linked to all, and AdER to most psychological outcomes (β range = |0.21-0.49|, p < .05). MalER, but not AdER, was associated with HC (β = 0.25, p = .009), whereas none of the ER strategy types were associated with HRV. Moreover, several associations between stressors and psychological outcomes were moderated by MalER and Mal/AdER, whereas AdER's role as a moderator was not confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed that adolescents' stressors are associated with both psychological and physiological outcomes and moderated by MalER or Mal/AdER. The lack of moderation by AdER directs toward the maladaptive shift theory. Investigations through a longitudinal, rather than a cross-sectional design, could further elucidate the current observations. Moreover, training in how to use ER effectively has a potential of increasing adolescents' stress resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kłosowska et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Stress and emotion regulation (n=214). Emotion regulation strategies was evaluated on Association between stressors and psychological/biological outcomes (p=< .05). Maladaptive emotion regulation moderated the association between stressors and psychological outcomes, and was directly associated with hair cortisol levels (β = 0.25, p = .009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: