Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methodological review examines error risk control in psychiatric exploratory research, highlighting tailored significance thresholds over arbitrary conventions.
Many traditional statistical approaches to data analysis assume a relatively simple situation in which the investigator is testing a single hypothesis. Most research in psychiatry, on the other hand, is exploratory in nature and involves testing many hypotheses. Exploratory research presents special problems in data analysis, which are discussed in this overview. Special statistical approaches that are available to reduce error risk, such as the Bonferroni inequality, are described. The importance of selecting confidence levels appropriate to a particularly investigation, rather than arbitrary use of the .05 level, is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grove et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: