Key result
High monetary incentive during pain elicits ~83% greater cardiac pre-ejection period reactivity versus low incentive.
Why the study?
To test the combined effect of pain and monetary incentive on effort-related cardiovascular response during cognitive performance.
Does monetary incentive moderate the impact of physical pain on effort-related cardiac response in healthy volunteers?
Does monetary incentive moderate the impact of physical pain on effort-related cardiac response in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: -5.54% vs -3.02%
p-value: p=0.001
Motivational incentives can counteract effort deficits associated with physical pain, as evidenced by effort-related cardiac responses.
Monetary incentives may offset pain-related effort reduction in volunteers; leaves open translation to patients with chronic pain.
Two experiments tested the combined effect of pain and monetary incentive on effort-related cardiovascular response during cognitive performance. Healthy volunteers received individually adjusted painful or nonpainful thermal stimulations during a difficult cognitive task and expected high or low monetary incentive for successful performance. Our primary cardiovascular effort measure were responses of cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) during task performance. Based on the pain literature suggesting that pain adds supplementary demand in cognitive functioning, we predicted pain to increase subjective task difficulty. Moreover, based on motivational intensity theory, we expected this to increase effort only when high effort was justified by high monetary incentive. Correspondingly, we predicted pain to lead to low effort due to disengagement when monetary incentive was low. Effort in the nonpainful conditions was expected to fall in between these conditions. The results of both studies offered support to our predictions. Our findings provide the first evidence for the moderating effect of monetary incentive on physical pain’s impact on effort. This suggests that motivational incentives can counteract effort deficits associated with pain. Clinical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cancela et al. (2023) studied Healthy volunteers (n=30). Painful thermal stimulation with high monetary incentive vs. Painful thermal stimulation with low monetary incentive was evaluated on Pre-ejection period (PEP) reactivity (p=0.001). High monetary incentive during painful stimulation elicited significantly stronger cardiac pre-ejection period reactivity (-5.54 ms) compared to low monetary incentive (-3.02 ms).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: