Key result
Ventilatory threshold shows a U-shaped relationship with VO2peak, reaching a nadir of ~43% VO2R.
Why the study?
Current guidelines do not consider using ventilatory threshold for aerobic exercise prescription, prompting an evaluation of ventilatory threshold relative to VO2peak, VO2 reserve, heart rate reserve, and rating of perceived exertion across a spectrum of fitness levels.
How does ventilatory threshold relate to V̇O2peak, V̇O2 reserve, heart rate reserve, and rating of perceived exertion across different fitness levels?
Observational (n=863)
How does ventilatory threshold relate to V̇O2peak, V̇O2 reserve, heart rate reserve, and rating of perceived exertion across different fitness levels?
The relationship between ventilatory threshold and V̇O2 reserve follows a U-shaped curve across fitness levels, while perceived exertion at the ventilatory threshold remains constant, providing insights for individualized aerobic exercise prescription.
U-shaped VT%VO2R across fitness may refine intensity targets; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
PURPOSE: ACSM guidelines state that aerobic exercise intensity should be 30%/40% to 89% V̇O 2 reserve (V̇O 2 R) or heart rate reserve (HRR). Determining the proper intensity within this range is the "art" of exercise prescription, often relying on rating of perceived exertion (RPE) as the adjunctive intensity modulator. Current guidelines do not consider the use of ventilatory threshold (VT) due to the need for specialized equipment and methodological issues. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate VT related to V̇O 2peak , V̇O 2 R, HRR, and RPE across the full spectrum of very low to very high V̇O 2peak values. METHODS: Eight hundred and sixty-three records of exercise tests were retrospectively examined. Data were stratified for V̇O 2peak , activity level, age, test modality, and sex. RESULTS: When stratified for V̇O 2peak , V̇O 2 at VT (V̇O 2 vt) had a lower mean value of ~14 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 in the lowest fit, rose gradually until median V̇O 2peak , and rose steeply thereafter. When graphed relative to V̇O 2peak , V̇O 2 vt as a percentage of V̇O 2 R (VT%V̇O 2 R) resembled a U-shaped curve, with a nadir ~43% V̇O 2 R at V̇O 2peak ~40 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 . Average VT%V̇O 2 R increased to ~75% in groups with the lowest or highest V̇O 2peak . There was a large variance in the value of VT at all V̇O 2peak levels. Mean RPE at VT was 12.5 ± 0.93, regardless of V̇O 2peak . CONCLUSIONS: Given the relationship of VT as the transition from moderate- to higher-intensity exercise, these data may help the understanding of aerobic exercise prescription in persons across the spectrum of V̇O 2peak values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaskill et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Exercise testing (n=863). Exercise testing was evaluated on Ventilatory threshold related to VO2peak, VO2R, HRR, and RPE. Ventilatory threshold as a percentage of VO2 reserve showed a U-shaped curve relative to VO2peak, with a nadir of ~43% VO2R at VO2peak ~40 mL/kg/min and increasing to ~75% at fitness extremes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: